[Harbour] Re: OFF: letodb suggestions

[Massimo Belgrano]

2009/6/3 Alexander S.Kresin <alex at belacy.belgorod.su>

>  One reason will be that new harbour version is better and more stable and
>> more powerfull
>>
>
>  Harbour versions before 1.00 was quite stable, too. I, for example, worked
> with the code, dated by 2008-01-25 ( don't know, what version it is :) )
> till last month and have migrated to 1.01 because ... I don't know why :),
> but not due to problems or limitations with an old one


Here we are discussing naming next version 2.0 becase it have a lof of
impementation and bug remove
so better having all userbase migrated on next version


>
>  In corner of letodb suggestion Is possible think a letodb server version
>> as a service?
>>
>
>  Yes, I think. I haven't concern in this, because I don't know, what
> advantages letodb could get being a service.
>
Basically advantage it start with system startup WIll be loaded in server
also without login (without trip)



-- 
Massimo Belgrano
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.harbour-project.org/pipermail/harbour/attachments/20090603/01fc98da/attachment.html